Chiles v. Salazar · ¶161

One more thought on this: The majority rigidly imposes a history-and-tradition test that treats the plethora of historical examples as insufficient. See ante, at 650–654. But it should instead find the long tradition of state laws setting standards of care by regulating the professional conduct of medical providers—including those who treat with speech— doubly reassuring.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.