Chiles v. Salazar · ¶26

After the Tenth Circuit ruled, Ms. Chiles sought certiorari. In doing so, she argued that the Tenth Circuit's decision “worsened a circuit confict” over how the First Amendment interacts with laws like Colorado's. Pet. for Cert. 16; compare 116 F. 4th, at 1221, and Tingley, 47 F. 4th, at 1077, with Catholic Charities of Jackson, 162 F. 4th, at 696; Otto v. Boca Raton, 981 F. 3d 854, 868–870 (CA11 2020); King v. Governor of New Jersey, 767 F. 3d 216, 229 (CA3 2014), abrogated in part by National Institute of Family and Life Ad vocates v. Becerra, 585 U. S. 755, 767–769 (2018) (NIFLA); Tingley v. Ferguson, 57 F. 4th 1072, 1083–1085 (CA9 2023) (Bumatay, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.