Chiles v. Salazar · ¶57

This argument stumbles out of the gate, for it proceeds at far too high a level of generality. From three specific sets of laws, Colorado and the dissent ask us to recognize a cavernous “First Amendment Free Zone,” Stevens, 559 U. S., at 469 (internal quotation marks omitted), one in which States may censor almost any speech they consider “substandard care.” It is, once more, an approach our precedents already foreclose.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.