gloss · the reading room

Bowe v. United States · ¶126

His theory runs this way. Section 2255(h) instructs that a federal prisoner's second or successive attack “must be certified as provided in section 2244.” That language, Mr. Bowe submits, sweeps in only those parts of § 2244 that address how an appellate panel goes about certifying a second or successive filing. And it does not sweep in subparagraph (E) because—unlike all of § 2244(b)(3)'s other subparagraphs—it does not “provide” for certification.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.