Bowe v. United States · ¶145

The majority offers no colorable answers to these questions because none can be had. Just like Hohn and our col- league's opinion two years ago in In re Bowe, Castro fully appreciated that subparagraph (E) imposes a “clear limit” on our certiorari jurisdiction, one applicable to federal and state prisoners alike. Hohn, 524 U. S., at 250 (emphasis added); see also In re Bowe, 601 U. S., at 1016 (acknowledging that “§ 2244(b)(3)(E)'s bar on petitioning for review” would preclude Mr. Bowe himself from seeking certiorari).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.