Bowe v. United States · ¶40

The dissent contends that this clear-indication requirement comes from “thin air.” Post, at 57–62 (opinion of Gorsuch, J.). As just explained, however, it comes from Castro itself. It also draws support from this Court's historical practice of declining to read ambiguous statutes to limit its certiorari jurisdiction, which even the dissent acknowledges. See post, at 61–62.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.