gloss · the reading room

Bowe v. United States · ¶63

At bottom, the Government's arguments suggest that § 2255(h)'s cross-reference might include § 2244(b)(3)(E)'s certiorari bar. They do not, however, provide the necessary “clear indication” that Congress intended to “close our doors to a class of habeas petitioners seeking review.” Castro, 540 U. S., at 381. Absent such clear indication, federal prisoners are not prohibited from seeking certiorari from a panel's denial of authorization to file a second or successive motion.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.