Bowe v. United States · ¶70

The reasoning why this Court has jurisdiction also shows the error in this position. See supra, at 28–31. Section 2255(h)'s cross-reference incorporates the procedures in § 2244 only as they relate to how a panel certifes a second or successive filing. It then tells the panel to use those procedures to evaluate whether the federal prisoner's second or successive motion “contain[s]” either newly discovered evidence, § 2255(h)(1), or a new rule of constitutional law, § 2255(h)(2). Nothing in § 2255(h) suggests that it incorporates § 2244 for any other purposes. Thus, by its terms, § 2255(h)'s cross-reference does not incorporate the content requirements contained in § 2244, like § 2244(b)(1)'s old- claim bar.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.