Bowe v. United States · ¶75

Amicus’s remaining nontextual arguments do not change this conclusion. She contends that §2244(b)(1) is a necessary tool, indeed “central,” for panels to meet §2244(b)(3)(D)’s 30-day deadline, and that Congress therefore must have intended for it to apply in all cases in which authorization is needed. Brief for Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae 12, 23–26. That logical leap lacks sufficient foundation.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.