gloss · the reading room

Bowe v. United States · ¶87

As a result, a three-judge panel never undertook the required process for evaluating—i.e., for granting or denying—Bowe’s authorization request. Put differently, because the panel dismissed Bowe’s petition, there was no “grant or denial” of his “authorization” request that could be challenged in a petition for certiorari, as §2244(b)(3)(E) requires.
Read in context ›

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.