gloss · the reading room

Villarreal v. Texas · ¶33

For Texas, the line is substantive. The reason Perry held a total nonconferral order permissible during a brief daytime recess, Texas argues, is because of the unprotected content of discussion that presumably occupies such a recess, not simply because of the amount of time the recess lasts. And if that is so, then a court order prohibiting only unprotected content (like, Texas posits, the one here) comports with the Sixth Amendment.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.