Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections · ¶42

Under our standing precedents, this is an easy case. Article III requires plaintiffs to assert and establish an “injury in fact”—i. e., the “invasion of a legally protected interest” that is both “concrete and particularized” and “actual or imminent.” Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U. S. 555, 560 (1992) (internal quotation marks omitted). Congressman Bost has failed to allege that the election-related law he seeks to challenge has caused him to suffer any injury that satisfes those requirements.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.