gloss · the reading room

Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections · ¶74

In short, our precedents establish that certainty of future harm is not the benchmark, as the majority suggests. Ante, at 7. Rather, all that is required is a plausible allegation (eventually followed by proof ) of a substantial risk of future injury.
Read in context ›

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.