Barrett v. United States · ¶44

Like the Court of Appeals, see 102 F. 4th, at 90–93, amicus challenges the premise of this assessment: He insists that Congress has textually authorized dual convictions under subsection (c)(1) and subsection (j). For proof, he points to subsection (c)'s consecutive-sentence mandate. It reads:

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.