National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm’n · ¶63
In McCutcheon, the Court explained that such earmarking rules constitute a targeted and constitutionally permissible way for the Government to prohibit circumvention of the base limits on contributions to candidates. 572 U. S., at 222–223. Indeed, it is difficult to conjure up realistic scenarios where a donor could circumvent the base limits on contributions to candidates via earmarking in a way that does not also violate those earmarking regulations. See id., at 223.Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.