National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm’n · ¶98

Second, although the dissent raises concerns about money in political campaigns and about this Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence, the core disagreement between the Court and the dissent is legally quite narrow, albeit practically significant. See post, at 5 (opinion of KAGAN, J.) (“Our difference concerns only—though this is no small ‘only’—whether the Government’s strong interest in preventing circumvention of the base limits also justifies the coordinated-expenditure caps at issue here”).

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.