Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S. A. (Cuba) · ¶83

First, they invoke the canon against implied repeal. They say that the Helms-Burton Act can supersede the FSIA only if the two Acts “‘irreconcilabl[y] conflict.’” Brief for Respondents 20 (quoting Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U. S. 379, 395 (2009)). And because some small subset of suits under the Act might satisfy the FSIA’s exceptions, they claim that there is no irreconcilable conflict.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.