Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist · ¶13
Hain nevertheless argued in its notice of removal that removal was proper because Whole Foods had been improperly joined and should be dismissed, which would leave only parties who were completely diverse in federal court. The Palmquists disagreed, argued that Whole Foods was properly joined, and moved to remand the case to state court given the lack of diversity jurisdiction.Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.