Pitchford v. Cain · ¶39

After the trial court denied Mr. Pitchford's motion, he appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court. There, Mr. Pitch- ford continued to press the statistical argument he had made during jury selection. Id., at 209–210, 223–225. But now he directed most of his efforts to the separate comparative juror argument he introduced for the first time after trial, drawing detailed comparisons in his appellate brief between white jurors who were not struck and the four black jurors who were. Id., at 210–223.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.