Geo Group, Inc. v. Menocal · ¶63

Rather than conducting the public-interest inquiry that our immunity case law employs, the majority trains most of its analysis on a single question: Whether the Yearsley doctrine “turn[s] on [the defendant's] conduct's legality.” Ante, at 445. Because the Yearsley doctrine does, the majority concludes that it fails to satisfy the third collateral-order requirement. That analysis is oversimplifed.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.