Urias-Orellana v. Bondi · ¶13

Given the dearth of evidence establishing past or future persecution, the IJ determined that Urias-Orellana did not qualify as a refugee eligible for asylum under § 1101(a)(42). See id., at 44a. The IJ determined that Gamez-Mejia and G. E. U. G. were likewise ineligible for asylum, as their claims were “derivativ[e]” of Urias-Orellana's. Id., at 28a. So, the IJ ordered all three petitioners' removal. Id., at 44a.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.