Urias-Orellana v. Bondi · ¶23

Whether a given agency determination fts within the purview of subparagraph (B)—and is thus reviewed for substantial evidence—is not always clear. Indeed, the courts of appeals have split over the standard of review that should apply to the agency's determination that an asylum applicant has not established past “persecution” or a “well-founded fear of [future] persecution” within the meaning of § 1101(a)(42)(A).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.