First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport · ¶15
In addition to its complaint, First Choice fled a motion seeking a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Attorney General from enforcing his subpoena. In support of its motion, First Choice tendered two declarations. In one, anonymous donors represented that, if they “had known information about the[ir] donation[s] might be disclosed to an official hostile to pro-life organizations,” “[e]ach of [them] would have been less likely to donate to First Choice.” Id., at 177a. The donors added that they submitted their declaration anonymously because they believed they might face retribution otherwise “given [the Attorney General's] record of hostility toward pro-life groups.” Id., at 175a. In the second declaration, the group's executive director similarly represented that the Attorney General's request threatened to “weaken [First Choice's] ability to recruit new donors . . . as prospective…Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.