First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport · ¶37
Finally, consider First Choice's two unrebutted declarations. In the first, several donors represented that “[e]ach of us would have been less likely to donate to First Choice if we had known information about the donation might be disclosed” to the Attorney General. Id., at 177a. The donors added that they submitted their declaration anonymously because they feared what they called the Attorney General's “record of hostility toward pro-life groups.” Id., at 175a. In the second declaration, First Choice's executive director stated that the Attorney General's demand threatened to “weaken [the group's] ability to recruit new donors . . . as prospective partners would be hesitant to risk the revelation of their personal information through government investigation.” Id., at 183a.Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.