gloss · the reading room

First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport · ¶43

Notably, too, Mr. Platkin declines to defend the district court's ruling that “our Nation's federalism” does not “tolera[te]” First Choice's effort to have a federal court adjudicate its federal suit while state court litigation over the subpoena remains ongoing. Pet. App. 56a. Nor does Mr. Platkin defend the Court of Appeals' similar assessment that First Choice must first litigate its constitutional objections in state court in order to “ripe[n]” its constitutional claims. Id., at 4a.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.