First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport · ¶52
Below, the district court offered still another analogy to the same end. It pointed to lower court decisions applying Reisman v. Caplin, 375 U. S. 440 (1964). See Pet. App. 77a– 80a, and n. 4. In Reisman, and its cousin, FTC v. Claire Furnace Co., 274 U. S. 160 (1927), this Court confronted efforts to enjoin non-self-executing federal administrative subpoenas before a court directed their enforcement. See Reis man, 375 U. S., at 444–446; Claire Furnace, 274 U. S., at 165– 166, 173–174. In both cases, we read the governing statutes in question as preferring federal court review only after the government sought to compel production. See Reisman, 375 U. S., at 446–450; Claire Furnace, 274 U. S., at 174. And in both cases, we held that the availability of federal court review on the back end provided the plaintiffs “an adequate remedy at law,” which meant that their pre-emptive requests for…Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.