First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport · ¶57
Moving from the categorical to the case specific, the Attorney General submits that, even if a non-self-executing subpoena seeking donor information can objectively chill First Amendment freedoms, his subpoena to First Choice did not. Yes, that subpoena sought information about those who donate to the group by almost any means, whether in person, over the phone, or online. See Pet. App. 95a–101a, 110a. But, the Attorney General stresses, the subpoena did not seek information about individuals who give through one website. See id., at 110a. The Attorney General says he is content this specific website could not mislead a potential donor into thinking that First Choice provides or refers for abortions. Brief for Respondent 28. Accordingly, he will permit First Choice to solicit funds through that avenue without disclosing the identities of those who donate through it. That permission, the…Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.