gloss · the reading room

Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel · ¶4

Under 28 U. S. C. § 1446(b)(1), a party sued in state court who prefers to proceed in federal court generally has 30 days after receiving notice of the state-court action to remove the lawsuit to federal court (if there are grounds for doing so). In this case, petitioners (collectively Enbridge) unquestionably did not meet § 1446(b)(1)'s 30-day deadline, instead waiting 887 days after being served with the Michigan Attorney General's state-court complaint before removing the case to federal court. Enbridge argues that the District Court nevertheless had equitable discretion to toll § 1446(b)(1)'s deadline and excuse this late filing. This Court disagrees. Because § 1446(b)(1)'s text, structure, and context are inconsistent with equitable tolling, Enbridge's removal was untimely and remand to the Michigan state court is required.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.