Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe · ¶109
The other circumstance in which this Court will sometimes overturn a statutory precedent is if its standard has “prove[n] unworkable.” Kimble, 576 U. S., at 459. Here, there is no reason to think that is true of Sosa’s two-step framework. No one argues before this Court that Sosa’s steps are unclear or hard to apply. Instead, Cisco argues that Sosa and the ATS have allowed causes of action to proliferate, ensnaring defendants and courts in litigation. See Brief for Petitioners 26.Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.