Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe · ¶97

Neither point explains why it respects Congress to recognize causes of action for the Blackstone three but not for other international-law principles that are sufficiently similar to those causes of action. To the extent the majority thinks that the Blackstone three are uniquely supported by the historical record, that is doubtful for the reasons given above. See supra, at 13–14. There also is no indication that Congress intended to “tra[p]” the ATS “in amber.” United States v. Rahimi, 602 U. S. 680, 691 (2024).

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.