Hamm v. Smith · ¶100
Today, however, the Court dismisses the State's petition as improvidently granted, without explanation. The effect of the Court's failure, twice in this case, to bring clarity to precedents that manifestly “lac[k] clarity” is that Alabama will not be able to carry out its lawful sentence. Moore II, 586 U. S., at 143 (Roberts, C. J., concurring).Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.