gloss · the reading room

Hamm v. Smith · ¶117

Even under its modern approach to stare decisis, this Court has “ `often' ” concluded that precedents must be overruled. Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. 83, 116–122 (2020) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring in part). Atkins satisfes the criteria the Court has recently relied on to overrule constitutional precedents. See Ramos, 590 U. S., at 120–122.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.