Hamm v. Smith · ¶165

“ `Smith did not consistently score so high that the [c]ourt is confdent that the lowest score can be thrown out as an outlier or that the standard error for the' other tests, which individually suggest Smith's true IQ may be 70 or lower, `can be disregarded.' ” Id., at 6a (quoting Smith v. Dunn, Civ. Action No. 05–cv–00474 (SD Ala., Aug. 17, 2021), App. to Pet. for Cert. 70a; emphasis added).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.