Hamm v. Smith · ¶29

Smith, for his part, contends that courts must assess multiple IQ scores “holistically,” which includes “considering those scores in light of other evidence—particularly expert testimony—regarding the scores' validity and meaning, and other evidence of the claimant's intellectual functioning.” Brief for Respondent 2. Smith does not disagree with Alabama and the United States, however, that as part of that holistic analysis, courts could consider an aggregation of scores, such as a composite score, if one is presented.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.