Hamm v. Smith · ¶40
The principal dissent apparently seeks to go further and wants this Court to provide more granular guidance about which specific methods of assessing multiple scores are acceptable. Post, at 322–324. As described above, this Court cannot differentiate between methods because these various methods were not raised in the litigation below.Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.