Hamm v. Smith · ¶46

To start, the principal dissent claims that the lower courts misinterpreted Hall and Moore. They did not. This Court has not previously addressed the method by which “courts should evaluate multiple IQ scores,” Hamm, 604 U. S., at 2, but it has confronted several cases involving multiple scores. The District Court's holistic review below was consistent with those precedents.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.