Hamm v. Smith · ¶50

The principal dissent claims that the District Court contravened Moore by “defat[ing] its estimate of Smith's IQ based on details about his” adaptive defcits. Post, at 330. That misunderstands both the Court's decision in Moore and the District Court's decision below.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.