Hamm v. Smith · ¶87

The Eleventh Circuit disagreed. It thought that it was “unreasonable” to suppose that Smith did not have significantly subaverage intelligence. Smith v. Campbell, 620 Fed. Appx. 734, 750–751 (2015). The court ordered the District Court to give Smith a new hearing for reconsideration of his Atkins claim de novo. 620 Fed. Appx., at 751–752.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.