Hamm v. Smith · ¶90

Hall did not tell courts what to do when low scores whose error ranges touch 70 are paired with multiple higher scores whose error ranges do not. The Court, as in Atkins, left States without guidance: “[T]he analysis of multiple IQ scores jointly is a complicated endeavor.” 572 U. S., at 714. Exactly how courts should weigh multiple IQ scores remained unclear. See id., at 742–743 (Alito, J., dissenting).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.