Hencely v. Fluor Corp. · ¶10

The Army's investigation found Fluor primarily responsible for the attack. Interviews of Fluor personnel “reveal[ed] a poor understanding by Fluor supervisors as to who was responsible for Nayeb's supervision” and “an unreasonable complacency by Fluor to ensure Local National employees were properly supervised at all times, as required by their contract.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 171. The Army also concluded that Fluor failed to impose adequate disciplinary measures on Nayeb, who slept on the job and was absent from his work area without justification, even though these were grounds for fring him. Fluor's lax supervision, the Army's report continued, allowed Nayeb to check out tools that he did not need for his job and that he used to make the bomb inside Bagram. And, Fluor “was . . . deficient in [its] performance of executing and supervising escort duties” when employees like Nayeb left…

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.