Hencely v. Fluor Corp. · ¶22

To start, Boyle does not squarely govern. It concerned the performance of a procurement contract, not a performance contract, and the combatant-activities exception was not at issue. Accord, post, at 64 (opinion of Alito, J.). But, regardless, its reasoning does not support the Fourth Cir- cuit's preemption rule.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.