Hencely v. Fluor Corp. · ¶39

Perhaps sensing this, Fluor and the Government argue that, even without Boyle, the Constitution's structure implicitly preempts any suit against a military contractor operating in a combat zone. See Brief for Respondents 30–33; Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 30. This argument has no basis in the text of the Constitution or our precedent.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.