Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. · ¶22

Shortly after President Trump allowed the suspension of the right of action to expire in May 2019, Havana Docks fled lawsuits against these four cruise lines in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Havana Docks alleged that, between 2016 and 2019, the cruise lines had traffcked in confscated property to which Havana Docks owned a claim.The cruise lines did not dispute that they used the docks in question “without the authorization of” Havana Docks. §6023(13)(A). Instead, the cruise lines argued they are not liable because Havana Docks' property interest in those docks would have expired in 2004 even if there had been no confscation, and the cruise lines “could not have traffcked in a time-limited concession that expired in 2004.” Havana Docks Corp. v. Carnival Corp., 592 F. Supp. 3d 1088, 1194 (SD Fla. 2022).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.