Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. · ¶64

To be sure, as petitioner argued below, at the same time the Government made these statements, it also warned respondents that their activities had to comply with any applicable regulations and could not exceed the scope of the licenses provided to them. See, e. g., id., at 570–572 (emphasizing additional restrictions on cruises); id., at 869– 875 (cautionary letter issued by OFAC). Even so, as the United States explained at argument, “[t]o the extent that Respondents received assurances from appropriate government officials that what they were doing was lawful and authorized,” holding them liable for that conduct could “raise due process concerns.” Tr. of Oral Arg. 57–58.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.