gloss · the reading room

Olivier v. City of Brandon · ¶8

Because he still wanted to preach near the amphitheater, Olivier's next step was to file this lawsuit in federal court, naming the City and its police chief as defendants. The suit is brought under § 1983, which authorizes claims against state and local officials for the “deprivation of any rights” secured by the Constitution. Olivier's complaint alleges that the city ordinance violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment by consigning him (and other speakers) to the amphitheater's out-of-the-way protest area. The complaint seeks, as a remedy, a declaration that the ordinance infringes his (and other speakers') First Amendment rights and an injunction preventing city officials from enforcing the ordinance in the future.In other words, the relief requested is only prospective; Olivier seeks neither the reversal of, nor compensation for, his prior conviction. And Olivier has…
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.