Mullin v. Doe · ¶29
Legal challenges to these decisions began almost immediately. In opposing those challenges, the Government’s front line of defense has been the judicial-review bar in §1254a(b)(5)(A), but the lower courts have consistently rebuffed that argument. The Government once again led with that jurisdictional argument in asking us to stay two District Court orders that postponed the termination of Venezuela’s TPS designation, and we granted those requests. Noem v. National TPS Alliance, 605 U. S. 909 (2025) (NTPSA I); Noem v. National TPS Alliance, 606 U. S. 1062 (2025) (NTPSA II). Nevertheless, lower courts, including those in the cases now before us, have continued to block the Secretary’s attempted terminations of other TPS designations. E.g., 1 App. 33 (Syria); id., at 40 (Syria); 818 F. Supp. 3d 126, 186 (DC 2026) (Haiti); 2 App. 719 (Haiti); Doe v. Noem, 822 F. Supp. 3d 893, 901 (ND Ill.…Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.