Mullin v. Doe · ¶35

The court claimed not to “opin[e] on the substance of the Secretary’s termination decision or on her authority to make such a decision,” but it proceeded to criticize the Secretary for “taking a hatchet to the TPS system.” Id., at 15– 16. The court found that the Secretary’s decision to terminate Syria’s TPS designation constituted one aspect of the current administration’s “anti-immigrant agenda.” Id., at 25. The court then indefinitely postponed the effective date of the termination of Syria’s TPS designation and declined to stay its own order.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.