T. M. v. University of Md. Medical System Corporation · ¶109

Perhaps recognizing that its new approach to §1257 requires some other rationale, the Court spends several pages running through various policy considerations. Applying §1257’s finality limit, the Court says, would generate “anomalous outcomes,” disrespect “federalism,” and sow “confusion.” Ante, at 13, 17. Its theory is an innovation, but not an improvement.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.