T. M. v. University of Md. Medical System Corporation · ¶12
In the midst of those lawsuits, T. M. and respondents negotiated a settlement agreement to facilitate T. M.’s discharge, and the state judge presiding over the state habeas petition entered the agreement as a consent order. The consent order provided for T. M.’s immediate release subject to several conditions, including that T. M. would “(1) obtain a new treating psychiatrist and continue to take her hospital- prescribed medications; (2) regularly meet and consult with a third-party provider regarding her treatment and medication; (3) accept a referral to [an outpatient clinic] and follow their recommendations; (4) take all prescribed medications; and (5) dismiss with prejudice all of her [and her parents’] pending actions against [respondents].” App. to Pet. for Cert. 24a. The consent order also required T. M.’s parents to monitor her use of her medications and report if she stopped…Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.