T. M. v. University of Md. Medical System Corporation · ¶46

The Court today neither expands nor constrains Rooker- Feldman. Instead, the Court leaves the doctrine as it found it: narrowly confined to “cases brought by state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced and inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments.” Exxon, 544 U. S., at 284. Because T. M.’s suit falls within these strict limits, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is affirmed.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.